-
When Marvalyn foster sued the Stamford dentist, both sides were taking an extreme risk in going to trial
Are you a victim of medical or dental malpractice? Has your dentist, doctor, or other medical professional performed their prescribed duties in a less than professional manner? Then you might want to consider taking legal action against the medical or dental professional who you believe acted inappropriately. There are many forms of medical and dental malpractice, so you should be aware of the laws governing malpractice suits so you can determine if you case has merit, and has a good chance of winning should your case go to trial. If you went to a medical and dental professional in good faith seeking medical or dental treatment, and failed to receive that treatment due to subpar medical or dental attention, then you have been the victim of malpractice. If a doctor’s or dentist’s negligence has cause you to suffer any undue medical or dental problems, then you have been the victim of malpractice. Medical and dental professionals can be held accountable for their misconduct in the form of a financial settlement being granted to the patient, provided that they are found guilty of malpractice in a court of law. Medical and dental professionals who have been found guilty of malpractice are expected to pay a certain amount of money to the injured party to make up for any harm that they received in the course of seeking medical treatment. If the misconduct was particularly egregious, then this amount can be pretty severe. In the case where Marvalyn Foster sued the Stamford dentist, this proved to be the case. The settlement awarded to the plaintiff when Marvalyn Foster sued Stamford dentist was substantial, and to this day it serves as a textbook example of a slam dunk malpractice case. The facts were all on Foster’s side, but the dentist decided to put up a fight instead of trying to reach a settlement in mediation. So when Marvalyn Foster sued the Stamford dentist, the plaintiff ‘s legal team was confident in the case. They made their arguments as best they could, and showed the jury tremendous amount evidence benefiting their client. So when the jury found in favor of the plaintiff, it turned that when Marvalyn Foster sued the Stamford dentist, the plaintiff made the right choice.
There is of course always a risk when taking a malpractice to trial. When Marvalyn Foster sued the Stamford dentist, neither party knew what to expect. Even though both sides thought they had a strong case, they knew that anything can and often does happen in a court of law. They both were taking a considerable risk in going to trial, but going to trial is the only option if a settlement isn’t reached in the mediation phase of the legal proceedings. The jury could just have easily found in favor of the defendant, and in this case, the plaintiff would be left with nothing but legal bills. So both sides take a risk when a jury is involved. Contact a lawyer to discuss your chances should you malpractice case go to trial.
Summary: When Marvalyn Foster sued the Stamford dentist, the outcome of the trial was unknown to both parties.